ARGUMENT ANALYSIS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

ARGUMENT ANALYSIS - Essay Example Initially, Kamenetz rationalized that legal age requirements must be flexible depending on circumstances, valid endeavors and supplemented with specifically identified requirements. As averred, â€Å"legal age requirements should never stand alone. They should be flexible and pragmatic and paired with educational and cognitive requirements for the exercise of legal maturity† (Kamenetz par. 4). Using cognitive faculties, the author progressed by using logical appeals through citing credible contemporary practices. One of the valid supports presented legal regulations in driving. As disclosed, driving laws epitomized the best model for justifying that an early orientation to driving classes would result in more positive outcomes, especially in terms of lesser fatal crashes. The statistics cited was sourced from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety which conducted a study which revealed that â€Å"the most restrictive of these programs are associated with a 38 percent reduction in fatal crashes among the youngest drivers† (Kamenetz par. 5). Using parallelism, the author expounded the early driving permit example to potentially include its application to voting through a proposed early voting permit. As suggested, a preliminary civics course could be used as a standard requirement for passing to qualify a young citizen to enforce the right to vote. The author further explored the applicability to empowering youngsters to expand the rights, not only to voting, but to include areas such as drinking, marriage, and responsible use of credit cards to manage financial obligations. The author indicated that â€Å"in reality, this is already when most people have their first jobs, their first drinks and their sexual initiations. The law ought to empower young people to negotiate these transitions openly, not furtively† (Kamenetz par. 7). However, the author failed to provide any counter-arguments to balance the proposed expansion of empowering teenage rs to these activities. The strengths of the author in supporting the contentions lie in the effective selection of examples which were effectively backed by reliable sources. The essay was structured in a clear and logical manner that flowed well. The tone was appropriate and formal to effectively manifest professionalism in treating the advocated lowering of voting age. There was no eminent overly expressed intention to use emotional appeal and therefore, the strategy of using logical appeal enhanced the author’s credibility in promoting the advocated cause. One noted weakness was the failure of the author to effectively reference the cited sources (such as the study published by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety). Moreover, there was a cited statistical figure at the concluding paragraph which was not appropriately cited: â€Å"Demographically, those over 85 are our fastest-growing group. By 2020, the entire nation will be about as silver-haired as Florida is todayâ⠂¬  (Kamenetz par. 11). These statements need citations to enable readers to verify their authenticity and reliability. Further, the concluding portion focused more on the threat or risks posed by the aging population that did not tie at all on the author’s thesis statement. There was lack of expounding support for recommending young teenagers at the earliest age of 16 to vote by either providing advantages and also balancing the